Prop 51? Prop 61? Wiener/Kim? I'm stuck on those.
-
-
Replying to @kenarchersf
wiener. I voted yes on 51 (that's school bonds right?) but I don't think
@JerryBrownGov supports it.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @JerryBrownGov
yeah and 61 is Rx. Sanders supports.
@TheLeagueSF opposes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that one was confusing. Bc it's hard to tell how the pharma industry would react, compensate.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The State of CA Legislative Analyst's Office gives possible outcomes. http://shea.senate.ca.gov/sites/shea.senate.ca.gov/files/lao_analysis_-_state_prescription_drug_purchases._pricing_standards._initiative_statute.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
also, please see our write up Kim/Wiener before deciding. Wiener has a lot to answer for: http://www.theleaguesf.org/guide#jane
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Wiener has been a disaster except for his 10%er A-Gay fanboys and developer/flippers
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
we've been averaging building 1,900 units a year for the last 20 years while 10K ppl have been moving
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @JimYoull and
here (net) per year in the last upcycle. I don't know what to tell you. We have to build more housing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
how about help stopping the bleed-out? busy as ever
@TenantsUnionSF w/ insane tenant harassment2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
yeah and don't build anything and shit's going to cost 2-3M the next time around. Just wait and see.
-
-
there is a finite upper bound ffs. We've reached it in SF. Boston was amazing in the 2001 meltdown
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JimYoull @kimmaicutler and
yr missing the reality that far fewer have $2M than $1M. Prices don't climb when props don't sell
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.