Prop 51? Prop 61? Wiener/Kim? I'm stuck on those.
-
-
Replying to @kenarchersf
wiener. I voted yes on 51 (that's school bonds right?) but I don't think
@JerryBrownGov supports it.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @JerryBrownGov
yeah and 61 is Rx. Sanders supports.
@TheLeagueSF opposes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that one was confusing. Bc it's hard to tell how the pharma industry would react, compensate.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The State of CA Legislative Analyst's Office gives possible outcomes. http://shea.senate.ca.gov/sites/shea.senate.ca.gov/files/lao_analysis_-_state_prescription_drug_purchases._pricing_standards._initiative_statute.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
also, please see our write up Kim/Wiener before deciding. Wiener has a lot to answer for: http://www.theleaguesf.org/guide#jane
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TheLeagueSF @kenarchersf
I'm pretty concerned that if we don't keep housing production up (of both market rate and BMR) we'll have $2.5M
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kenarchersf
Jane Kim has negotiated housing projects that include both!! She's our type of pro-development progressive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheLeagueSF @kenarchersf
SF Made was against her Prop X and also new applications for const are down by 60% bc developers have no idea what
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
to pay for land right now. I don't trust them to not push some totally mathematically impossible percentage that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
renders new housing creation impossible.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.