No. Because u're talking about destroying quality of life, creating an endless horrific urbanscape like Los Angeles.
-
-
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
so a more effective transit system with denser housing construction & starter homes wld destroy quality of life?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
More people in less space, yes. I think satellite cities-Seattle when I was young, Modesto now--are better choice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
SF Bay is pretty dense & crowded as it is. Why don't YOU move to Modesto?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
Because I worked my whole life to pay off my house so I could live where I live when I'm retired.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
the argument we're having is not about you paying more in cash flow now. The argument we are having is about capital
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
The argument is about u using taxes 2 evict me so greedy little newcomers like u can take my home.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
no that is not the argument we are having. People have the right to their homes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
Everything u have proposed penalizes people who had the audacity 2 buy a house as soon as they could.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
current system means you have profited from the exclusion of others & free-riding on the creative, economic energy of
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
this region. Prop. 13 is regressive. Disproportionately favors the wealthy. http://www.lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3497 …pic.twitter.com/vB7CdVHYh1
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.