No, because I have 2 move someplace next in the same market & that means if I sell I downgrade.
-
-
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
why not support more building so you have more options if you want to move?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @ladykayaker
railing against "out of state developers" & "foreign money" reminds me of southern complaints of "carpetbaggers"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
Yes. It's exactly same thing. Folk who come here with no concern 4 folk already here only 4 how much $ they can suck
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
those awful people building housing and starting businesses! The nerve!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
Start a business someplace else, where young folk can afford it. Rally around UC Merced, for example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
why don't you work the other direction? Ensure fewer ppl more to the SF Bay by making it more like Merced?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
can't turn suburbs back into farmland.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
No. Because u're talking about destroying quality of life, creating an endless horrific urbanscape like Los Angeles.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
they seem to be making lots of investment in public transit. and they're more affordable. http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-transit-bay-area-la-20161028-story.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.