and believe no more additional housing should be built
-
-
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
No. I believe that a lot of other problems r more urgent 2 solve, primarily non-resident unit-owners.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
75% of the 1.8 million people we expect to add to CA population in next 10 years will be kids of current Californians
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
Great. Lets move some jobs to Sacramento and to Modesto so we're not all in 1 basket.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
that is already what happens. It just happens to be poor people that move to Sacramento/Modesto. You're just
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
consigning young people & poor/middle-class to less prosperous areas, where they earn less.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
No. To less crowded areas. If u move the jobs there they r just as prosperous.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
you have to accept that more people are going to move to your region and account for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
without new housing, they'll buy up everything that exists and jack up prices
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
No. they won't. They can't. Because out of state speculators dominate the pricing right now.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
because the policies make it a scarce asset, which make it a great speculative asset. Duh.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.