I don't doubt they invited u, I"m just not impressed by the invitation.
-
-
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
so you believe the only people who may move there r 1-to-1 replacements of current residents who cn buy the homes
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
and believe no more additional housing should be built
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @constans @kimmaicutler
No. I believe that a lot of other problems r more urgent 2 solve, primarily non-resident unit-owners.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
75% of the 1.8 million people we expect to add to CA population in next 10 years will be kids of current Californians
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
Great. Lets move some jobs to Sacramento and to Modesto so we're not all in 1 basket.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
that is already what happens. It just happens to be poor people that move to Sacramento/Modesto. You're just
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
consigning young people & poor/middle-class to less prosperous areas, where they earn less.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @constans
No. To less crowded areas. If u move the jobs there they r just as prosperous.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @constans
that is just factually not true. Did you read this
@LAO_CA report done by actual economists? http://www.lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/212 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
CA used to see regional income convergence between inland & coastal area. Now it doesn't anymore.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.