OK, when it inevitably breaks down because of its $9.6B in maintenance needs over the next 10 years, tell me how you feel then.https://twitter.com/EyleenNad/status/791071838746980353 …
-
-
it still seems high. my concern is they have no incentive to be truthful. that said, i don't see any real alternatives
-
that particular model is not possible in California because of our land use & property tax system & fragmented governance.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
except in California, we can't capture those increases in land & property values around transit hubs because of *you know what*
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.