-
-
Replying to @natogreen
@kimmaicutler@natogreen Jobs/housing "balance" is too simplistic w/o accounting for affordability. More appropriate is Jobs/Housing "Fit".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And cities would be accountable to what they permit, whether developers choose to actually build the units or not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @natogreen
but if they get held up in NIMBY lawsuits, appeals that are neither the developer or city govt's fault?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen
The point is,cities don't control the building industry.Local gvts just permit things.Real estate capital builds it
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pcohensf @kimmaicutler
I'm not sure I understand the difference between balance and fit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @natogreen @kimmaicutler
(1/2) Balance simply counts any housing unit vs. any job. So a new janitor job and a new mansion is a 1:1 "balance"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @natogreen
the problem w PA is they've intentionally done such a bad job that what was one middle or even lower income
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
what was once
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
housing is now luxury housing on the price of the underlying land
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.