-
-
Replying to @natogreen
@kimmaicutler@natogreen Jobs/housing "balance" is too simplistic w/o accounting for affordability. More appropriate is Jobs/Housing "Fit".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And cities would be accountable to what they permit, whether developers choose to actually build the units or not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @natogreen
but if they get held up in NIMBY lawsuits, appeals that are neither the developer or city govt's fault?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen
The point is,cities don't control the building industry.Local gvts just permit things.Real estate capital builds it
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @pcohensf @natogreen
based on whether land values + expected 15% return make sense. But can also be held up through CEQA, or put on ballot.
11:32 PM - 18 Oct 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.