More subtly, several of the candidate statements have these weird references to preserving our "quality of life." http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/gov/depts/clk/elections.asp …https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/787517598720073728 …
-
-
Replying to @joelle_emerson
exactly. Only "quality people" can move to Palo Alto. Maintain "neighborhood character."
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I don't get the housing conversation. Either homeowners have the right to shape their community or not, then answers are easy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rogerdickey
answers are not easy because what are the boundaries of what defines a community?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @rogerdickey
does Palo Alto get to make decisions that clearly have a decimating effect on neighboring communities like East Palo Alto?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
ideally east PA would get to make those decisions
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rogerdickey @kimmaicutler
maybe EPA could pass a law that u can't buy a house unless u work there? Not sure if legal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I guess competition for limited resources sucks when u lose :( Doubly so if resource used to be yours. Affects us all somehow
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rogerdickey @kimmaicutler
if housing should be a special case resource maybe we try to amend bill of rights? So u can't get kicked out
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
they have rent control! Still not perfect bc there are so many legacy inequities in terms of housing wealth in this country.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.