I do enjoy the provocative, if purely symbolic, politics of SF exploring an annexation of Brisbane. http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nevius/article/SF-may-investigate-what-it-would-take-to-swallow-9646621.php …pic.twitter.com/ZXXz776RIt
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Exactly. I'm for some housing if it is safe. Painting Brisbane as NIMBYs and racists without having the facts is just wrong.
they are being NIMBYs. And property owning suburbs practicing exclusionary zoning can have racialized effects.
So you think if it was proven to be that toxic that it would be in the regional good to have people living on it?
it seems like all versions of the plan involve office and even a charter school. Your rationale seems selective, inconsistent.
Frankly, given the amount of traffic on 101 the regional good would be building nothing there.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.