The is the buried lede in this WSJ story about our two dystopian urban futures: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/09/14/what-if-urban-sprawl-is-the-only-realistic-way-to-create-affordable-cities/ … @issiromempic.twitter.com/XEYoUG1etv
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
glass-and-steel construction, which can add a ~200-300K in costs per unit
ideally, as @markasaurus said, shifting from single-family to rowhouses, duplexes, triplexes is cheaper but politically impossible
sprawl is naturally cheaper, but prob only more affordable for short periods of time, after tech disrupts urban land.
You can see that in SF, for example, where housing in Oakland costs *exactly* as much as in SF after subtracting BART
Yes, but only cheaper for the developer. The owner/occupier has much higher transit & health costs.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.