sprawl is "naturally affordable" because the land is cheaper. Apt towers are expensive in SF bc you have to shift from woodframe to
-
-
-
glass-and-steel construction, which can add a ~200-300K in costs per unit
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The study doesn't seem particularly rigorous. Also seems like it didn't account for transportation or infrastructure costs.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder if the answer is building completely new cities explicitly for dense housing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I dare you to write it your way! It would be awesome...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@MattRosoff@kimmaicutler The Bay Area, including SJ/SV, has seen one of the greatest slowdowns of sprawl. https://www.buildzoom.com/blog/cities-expansion-slowing …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That'd be hard. Americans only claim to tackle difficult problems. Guess we're screwed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Market demands more density/city-like features. Homeowners want the place to forever be a suburb
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Morosoph@issiromem parking lots! big box stores! there are so many!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.