Housing since the 1980s has worsened, yes. But that is not the fault of SF's pro-tenant left. Sorry, no.
-
-
Replying to @MBridegam @enf
tenant rights aren't the issue. An ultimately self-defeating alliance w NIMBY neighborhood associations is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
If this alleged unholy alliance existed, wouldn't there be more city funding by now for eviction defenSe?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam @enf
SF has one of the, if not the strongest, rent control ordinances in the country.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
Re: 1970s errors, a big one was limiting rent control to old housing stock that would diminish with time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The genuinely self-defeating yimby/landlord alliance wouldn't be seductive if all rents were stabilized.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MBridegam @kimmaicutler
Nobody was building rentals during early 50s rent control. I think you'd get nothing new but condos
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @enf @kimmaicutler
How does SF's experience compare to other rent control cities, e.g. NYC, or pre-1995 Boston/Cambridge?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam @enf
Massachusetts has chapter 40b http://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/uploads/California_40B_Working_Paper.pdf …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
Interesting re MA 40B, & new in a convo that oft goes circular. How does it compare to CA "by-right"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
need to read that report in closer detail. Just skimmed. But both NY/Mass have stronger metro or state rules
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.