yes but some effects were evident less than a decade later http://articles.latimes.com/1985-04-03/news/mn-28445_1_san-francisco-s-skyline …
-
-
or the initial appearance of homeless in 1983 as the lowest-quality tier of housing was cannibalized
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
The new economic inequality under Reagan created need for rock-bottom housing after a lot was demolished.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Housing since the 1980s has worsened, yes. But that is not the fault of SF's pro-tenant left. Sorry, no.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam @enf
tenant rights aren't the issue. An ultimately self-defeating alliance w NIMBY neighborhood associations is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
If this alleged unholy alliance existed, wouldn't there be more city funding by now for eviction defenSe?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam @enf
SF has one of the, if not the strongest, rent control ordinances in the country.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @enf
Re: 1970s errors, a big one was limiting rent control to old housing stock that would diminish with time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The genuinely self-defeating yimby/landlord alliance wouldn't be seductive if all rents were stabilized.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
assuming SF has no need or desire to accommodate newcomers
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
basically.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.