Correct.AH requires subsidy. There is none.Not even $400 mil the Gov killed. Supply, for whom?
-
-
Replying to @pcohensf @matthewplan and
he was trying for a deal so taxpayer subsidies would go farther per unit http://www.beyondchron.org/opponents-brown-housing-plan-put-400-million-risk/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @matthewplan and
Huh? Prescribing market rate development as "by right" in gentrifying communities is a deal?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SF_CCHO @matthewplan and
SF was aggressively gentrifying when your founder called for downzoning everything in the 70s
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @SF_CCHO and
ps, it's clearly failed over the last 40 years.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @SF_CCHO and
Please, tell us that history lesson again. It's so fascinating and righteous to point fingers!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pcohensf @kimmaicutler and
we can't solve 2day's probs if past political decisions r sacrosanct & exempt from criticism
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RevClown @kimmaicutler and
Yes, as relevant to today.Shall we go back to the Bay Area Council, urban renewal & SPUR then?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Many communities still struggle with the impacts of those planing and political decisions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and the white middle class suburban kids who moved into SF in the 1970s and downzoned everything
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
arguably crowded out rental and ownership opportunities for communities displaced from adjacent
-
-
-
Wow, some serious revisionist history.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.