Doesn't sound right-- Cupertino is more expensive *because* of schools. Ie without kids, might as well live nearby for cheaper
-
-
-
it's people aging in place. Hardly any turnover. The little that does turn over is insanely priced.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@TroyChristmasED should school funding then be going down? -
fewer kids, less money. Makes some sense. Only much more complicated in reality
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I wonder about places like that, will they still have high-performing school districts in 15 years?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Palo Alto also projecting declines
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TroyChristmasED Too bad if nearby crowded lower-performing schools won't let their kids transfer. Can't be forced to.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TroyChristmasED Common Bay Area prob, esp for hi-ranked elementary schools. Few young families can afford $2mm home.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TroyChristmasED ... This was not brought up when the Vallco redevelopment was opposed.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.