@bhanlon @kimmaicutler @pcohensf if u were to advocate for one set of statewide housing reforms, what would they be? others join in...
-
-
appreciation in existing California real estate.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
i'd do something to force accountability on production WRT RHNA and maybe a jobs-housing linkage
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RevClown @kimmaicutler
You can't simply hold cities accountable for RHNA performance w/out holding developers accountable via inclusionary
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
inclusionary does not produce sufficient low-income units. It isn't scalable. And in the context of a state that
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Inclusionary is effective and scalable. If you're willing to push developers. It is one of many solutions. No magic
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it has produce ~2,000 units since 1993.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
That's 2,000 more permanently affordable units than developers otherwise would create. It's a modest but fair share
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
but, of course, no one wants to give up their views, street parking, or land rents
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
but developers/investors also don't want to give up >20% IRRs or any rights to evict.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
developers don't really evict in SF given our practices. Less scrupulous real estate investors do
-
-
i'm thinking statewide
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
trying to get out of my self-imposed SF policy bubble
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.