inclusionary does not produce sufficient low-income units. It isn't scalable. And in the context of a state that
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Inclusionary is effective and scalable. If you're willing to push developers. It is one of many solutions. No magic
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it has produce ~2,000 units since 1993.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
it protects incumbent property owner assets while assuaging their conscience that they are forcing someone else to
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
subsidize a token, and wholly insufficient # of low-income units http://cityobservatory.org/inclusionary-zoning-has-a-scale-problem/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
or if you want a socialist critique (not mine), here you go: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/10/de-blasios-doomed-housing-plan/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
this isn't to say don't do it at all. But SF's discourse overemphasizes its effectiveness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Or is it that the Yimby's obsession with critiquing Inclusionary overemphasizes its purpose.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
maybe RHNA should look at the affordability breakdown of the total housing stock on top of new production.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
if you're falling into a deeper shortage regionally, affordability on all tiers of existing housing stock would decline
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.