i'd do something to force accountability on production WRT RHNA and maybe a jobs-housing linkage
-
-
Replying to @RevClown @kimmaicutler
You can't simply hold cities accountable for RHNA performance w/out holding developers accountable via inclusionary
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
inclusionary does not produce sufficient low-income units. It isn't scalable. And in the context of a state that
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Inclusionary is effective and scalable. If you're willing to push developers. It is one of many solutions. No magic
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it has produce ~2,000 units since 1993.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
it protects incumbent property owner assets while assuaging their conscience that they are forcing someone else to
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
subsidize a token, and wholly insufficient # of low-income units http://cityobservatory.org/inclusionary-zoning-has-a-scale-problem/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
or if you want a socialist critique (not mine), here you go: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/10/de-blasios-doomed-housing-plan/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
this isn't to say don't do it at all. But SF's discourse overemphasizes its effectiveness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Or is it that the Yimby's obsession with critiquing Inclusionary overemphasizes its purpose.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
NYC De Blasio progressives pushed mandatory IZ but they don't tout it as a panacea. Not in my conversations w them.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
No one touts inclusionary as a panacea. But reactionaries do react to it as such.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @kimmaicutler
this is meant to be a conversation among people seeking practical & effective measures
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.