@bhanlon @kimmaicutler @pcohensf if u were to advocate for one set of statewide housing reforms, what would they be? others join in...
-
-
appreciation in existing California real estate.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
i'd do something to force accountability on production WRT RHNA and maybe a jobs-housing linkage
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RevClown @kimmaicutler
You can't simply hold cities accountable for RHNA performance w/out holding developers accountable via inclusionary
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
inclusionary does not produce sufficient low-income units. It isn't scalable. And in the context of a state that
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Inclusionary is effective and scalable. If you're willing to push developers. It is one of many solutions. No magic
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it has produce ~2,000 units since 1993.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
That's 2,000 more permanently affordable units than developers otherwise would create. It's a modest but fair share
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
what if SF had built at 2X the rate overall w 2X (or more) the number of BMR units over the last 20 years?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @RevClown
Correction: SF doesn't build housing, developers & financiers do. And even if doubled, % inclusionary is the same.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and we would have double the number of protected BMR units and we would've done a better job at matching pop growth.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.