higher ed/Master Plan, and then they tried to fix it again w Prop. 111, which made school financing
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @DarwinBondGraha
each one in addition to bonds funded schools tens of billions/yr of no strings attached money
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @uscityplanner @DarwinBondGraha
but aren't the bonds mostly for new buildings, infrastructure improvements, not the educational experience?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @DarwinBondGraha
moving the goal posts at this point. all bonds are heavily supported by teachers unions and 'educators'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @uscityplanner @DarwinBondGraha
but I think my point about "strangling" still stands. If all you have are parcel taxes/construction bonds
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
and little flexibility on other categories....
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Serrano v. Priest + Prop. 13, shifted local control of school systems to the state
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @DarwinBondGraha
not even particularly damning, all other states have more or less the same structure.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @uscityplanner @DarwinBondGraha
still ranked 41st https://calmatters.org/articles/how-much-has-californias-education-spending-grown-in-last-5-years/ … It's up bc of Prop. 30 but that revenue source is volatile.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
$11K/student by 2020 (if CA doesn't have a massive downturn and have to lay off teachers like last time)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
would be around natl average, but Oakland is one of the most expensive markets in the country now.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.