But we need to acknowledge there are limits. We can't bulldoze GG Park or cover city to 20 stories and still be SF.
-
-
Parisian density seems nice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kimoco
If it looked like Paris and worked like Paris. But what we get are Paris references and ugly condos in wrong places
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And we need to have the serious discussion of who we want to be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Right now, we're quickly killing off much of what made SF desirable, & a Mecca for various things. A creative force.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
We will have no more Bohemian enclaves. No funky enclaves. No weird experimental restaurants.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
other pts of the country have them now. We have experimental restaurants, they're just crazy pricey.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kimoco
Well, yeah. Sort of. Was thinking of places that can afford to take risks, struggle, build.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @coolgrey
simultaneously be a good investment and remain affordable.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
No. But right now its investment and profits that are calling the shots. And our kids lack teachers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
OK, well, where does school financing come from? It comes from property taxes. Who cut property taxes 38 years ago?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Yes. I've long been hostile to Prop 13's impact on schools, having lived thru it.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.