I see that as feasible. However, it will worsen the financial incentives for cities to keep approving office over housing.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimoco @kimmaicutler
But we need to acknowledge there are limits. We can't bulldoze GG Park or cover city to 20 stories and still be SF.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Parisian density seems nice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kimoco
If it looked like Paris and worked like Paris. But what we get are Paris references and ugly condos in wrong places
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And we need to have the serious discussion of who we want to be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Right now, we're quickly killing off much of what made SF desirable, & a Mecca for various things. A creative force.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
We will have no more Bohemian enclaves. No funky enclaves. No weird experimental restaurants.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
other pts of the country have them now. We have experimental restaurants, they're just crazy pricey.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kimoco
Well, yeah. Sort of. Was thinking of places that can afford to take risks, struggle, build.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
into the state's Constitution.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.