put in place. A generation ago, passed Prop 13, Prop 218. Failed to raise VLF. So we have shitty transit, fiscalized land use
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
.
@kimmaicutler@juliacarriew How does the unfairness of Prop 13 mean that private bus companies should be able to break the law6 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @markasaurus @juliacarriew
as I said earlier, the private buses are a consequence of bad, poorly integrated land-use, transit decisions.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
perhaps, but you're implying this one guy has selfish motives.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Prop. 13 protects homeowners, but it also messes up a lot of other incentives.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
yeah I don't disagree about prop 13, just don't think that discredits someone enforcing city laws.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @natogreen
He can do whatever he wants. Just find it interesting that a lot of these people have assets worth millions & pay little in taxes
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimoco @natogreen
am I annoyed that Californian voters built 20+ prisons and 1 university in the last generation?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @kimoco
I'm annoyed by all that too, but I don't see why trying to enforce regulations on google buses is bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
it's not bad. But he also has a record of being anti-housing, which is ironic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.