Has anyone done an actual study on how much extra it costs to pay prevailing wages on housing const per unit v. not?https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/768212192428642305 …
-
-
Replying to @RobertGammon
there's a
@dillonliam story citing a 2005 UCB study saying its 9-37% http://urbanpolicy.berkeley.edu/pdf/DQR_ILRR_Proof072905.pdf …4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This study found it decreases LIHTC unit numbers http://ilr.sagepub.com/content/59/1/141.short …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
this is same Berkeley study. And yes, one counter is don't create more need with low wages
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
TBH, us journos should stop using the identifier "Berkeley study." (I'm guilty.) It means zippo now.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I mean it's a Berkeley study. No one has to like everything Berkeley does
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dillonliam @DarwinBondGraha and
an 11 year old study riddled with errors and since supplanted should be circ.filed
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RevClown @dillonliam and
what do you think of Quigleys work in general?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DarwinBondGraha @kimmaicutler and
Which is not to say agreement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I liked his work on systemic causes of homelessness.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.