or developers. or the state or federal give via some subsidy. someone pays. incumbent residents…
-
-
Replying to @interfluidity @kimmaicutler and
understandably resist when ppl claim some law of the mkt means it must be them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Who advocates for policies that would "cause existing residents to reset to mkt rates"?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
almost everyone. anything that involves tearing down existing residences now to build new ones later.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Can you cite any examples? I'm not aware of any YIMBYs supporting rental tear downs.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
um, the density bonus program? how do you think that is supposed to work?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The planning department identified "soft sites" where it would work, things like 1 story retail.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
there are some of those! but a very small fraction of where originally hoped-for housing would come from
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's simply untrue. The planning department's projections did not include rental tear downs.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I can’t speak to, and don’t much care abt, the planning dept’s projections. the program very clearly did
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
they made amendments that basically stripped out eligibility for RC units to be pt of the program .
-
-
yes, they did. because incumbent residents understandably resist their own displacement!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @interfluidity @kimmaicutler and
what’s odd abt this convo is minimization of the fact anyone had anything to fear. of course they did!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.