Maybe also land use reg-u destroy n houses in price range x, new bldg must have N+2 affordable units same range. @cmercury25 @kimmaicutler
-
-
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
u clearly have no experience with long term dev planning. Cite a major city that works your way
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
vast majority of academics cite inventory problem. Ur operating out of political ideology
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cmercury25 @kimmaicutler
kim wants 2 address 'inventory problem' by raising taxes on long-term residents 2 force them 2 sell. This won't
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
do anything but transfer ownership from (oldtimer) occupants 2 investment co's gobbling up most of the homes.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
doesn't expand inventory. just greedy entitled young carpetbaggers driving out existing residents. Greed <> good.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @cmercury25
carpetbaggers? That's real nativist of you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @cmercury25
Yes, it is. Why should I lose my home just because you come in here and decide u want it & have more money?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ladykayaker @kimmaicutler
argue with economists then Lisa. But u shouldn't get all ur wealth from a home. Bad policy
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cmercury25 @kimmaicutler
like it or not home ownership is the single largest component of middle class wealth accumulation.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
and it's bad and destructive policy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.