of course I do. No argument will cause you to support public transit. Always another Cunard, waste of time.
-
-
Replying to @pkingdesign @ByRosenberg
I support public transit where it works. It is the taxpayer that does not ride it that pays the burden.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
the taxpayer that does not ride it gets less congested streets, faster commute.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
A valid observation but must all of these public systems ALWAYS lose money?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Californians destroyed any possibility of that when they passed Prop. 13, which means we could spend a lot
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
But think of how many fewer people are living under bridges because they did not lose their homes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
how many people are living under bridges because our laws make housing the most expensive in the country?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And yet you are advocating policies that would drive it up further. Logical fail.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
you have it backwards. Capped property taxes get capitalized into higher prices. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/80t0102p …
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Again, tell that to the people who live outside of LA, SD, and SF area.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
maybe we need different laws for rural vs. urban housing markets (as we do already)
-
-
Tell that to the fools in Sacramento that we keep sending there.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.