97% improved regional air quality improvement has zero science or engineering behind it. Ridership is suspect as well.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @wingod @ByRosenberg
in what way is ridership number suspect? I've ridden Caltrain daily for 8 years. Almost never have a seat past few yrs.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @wingod @ByRosenberg
normal passenger service with regular / frequent stops. Caltrain is what we're discussing.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pkingdesign @ByRosenberg
You do realize that the Diesel engines run electric motors to drive the running gear right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wingod @ByRosenberg
of course I do. No argument will cause you to support public transit. Always another Cunard, waste of time.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pkingdesign @ByRosenberg
I support public transit where it works. It is the taxpayer that does not ride it that pays the burden.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
the taxpayer that does not ride it gets less congested streets, faster commute.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
A valid observation but must all of these public systems ALWAYS lose money?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Californians destroyed any possibility of that when they passed Prop. 13, which means we could spend a lot
-
-
But think of how many fewer people are living under bridges because they did not lose their homes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
how many people are living under bridges because our laws make housing the most expensive in the country?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.