only on a small subset of the population. Roughly 1K people or so.
-
-
-
A source on that would be good. Last figure I saw was $241m, not $30m.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes, that's why Portland is having a tech boom: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/05/the-real-roots-of-portlands-housing-crisis/482988/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sfexaminer SF has too many tech jobs, at least in relation to housing. Is that fair? -
Eric Mar has refused to support more housing on the suburban Westside.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm fascinated/confused by how "tech company" will be defined in this proposed legislation. Do you know?
-
I'm trying but failing to imagine a legal framework that would tax Twitter's payroll but wouldn't tax Gap's payroll.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@xander76 that's the biggest issue. You can't selectively tax certain companies. Tech only is a sales tactic. -
You can tax activities differently, but everything a tech co does (like make software) is done by Wells/Gap/Levis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I could respect position of Kung Feng if he made an explicit job/housing balance argument against jobs.
-
"Jobs are great but justice" doesn't make sense
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.