Misinformation in here @timredmondsf. @JerryBrownGov's proposal does *not* override local inclusionary % reqs. https://twitter.com/TenantsTogether/status/741409274182533120 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This is what
@BenMetcalf_HCD says. If our % are higher, devs till have to abide by those.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @timredmondsf and
I didn't say it overrode local. Just that it stops SF from demanding more
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @48hills @kimmaicutler and
During negotiations on projects, since by-right allows no negotiations
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @48hills @timredmondsf and
lots of people who were pro Mission Moratorium have said that fighting project by
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @timredmondsf and
Developers can always offer more than they do if they have to
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @48hills @timredmondsf and
will you offer more? How about a transfer tax whenever your home is sold?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @timredmondsf and
Will you please correct your claim that my article was inaccurate?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I would if you added a clarification to your article saying that it does not override local % reqs.
-
-
I never said it did in the first place
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.