Irresponsible given the opportunity our city has on this site. @SFHAC @grow_SF @SPUR_Urbanist @SFyimby @kimmaicutlerhttps://twitter.com/jwinstonsf/status/741360120576114689 …
-
-
Replying to @coreysmith_17 @SFHAC and
From the Westwood Park Assn:pic.twitter.com/LP1Kbvjr6e
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @jwinstonsf @coreysmith_17 and
does nowhere else in San Francisco have "residential character"
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Looks like they're the only ones who got their CCRs enshrined in law http://planning.sanfranciscocode.org/2/244.1/ http://www.westwoodpark.com/documents/dg.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @dgouldin @kimmaicutler
Fortunately the site is outside their special-use district so it is irrelevantpic.twitter.com/GJjiI43rs7
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Creating the district was found to have "no significant impact on the environment" http://web.sfgov.org/bos/index.aspx?page=10593 …
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
oohh id love to see the original 1917 declaration of covenants for Westwood parkpic.twitter.com/9HDbdpXu9J
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
do it do it do it!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.