@kimmaicutler how do you feel about AirBnB in city policy? It's difficult to support YIMBY with them attached http://48hills.org/2016/05/27/1-million-tech-real-estate-money-pours-june-sf-election/ …
-
-
Replying to @shanand @kimmaicutler
Hard to argue against supply and demand if you're upset about Airbnb taking away units
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
housing stock from being hemorrhaged into permanent STRs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @hueykwik
and yet they is not a political slate for aggressive development and aggressive regulation. Very odd.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
but so is being simultaneously pro-development and lax on Airbnb if the goal is housing affordability.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @hueykwik
oddly polarized and ideological is today's SF. free market vs regulation. Policy outcomes be dammed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Platforms themselves have lots of regulation built into managing, routing user behavior, maintaining trust, safety, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @hueykwik
I hear you. I guess what I mean is can the free market alone solve this problem or is their any role for govt.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The "free market" requires government to exist, and to hold rule of law, recognize & define property rights.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @hueykwik
I'm with you, but I don't feel like the libertarian minded, well funded faction we're talking about fully agrees.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
a lot of libertarians I know are into soft authoritarianism -- as long you get to choose it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.