As only Gawker's @hamiltonnolan can put it: "San Francisco NIMBYs May Be Sacrificed So That Housing Can Live"http://gawker.com/san-francisco-nimbys-may-be-sacrificed-so-that-housing-1778151300?utm_campaign=socialflow_gawker_twitter&utm_source=gawker_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
so
@hamiltonnolan kind of ignores the 37 million Californians not living or working in SF though
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eean @hamiltonnolan
well the 37M Californians also have similar issues with affordability, especially in coastal communities.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
it is however possible to turn this libertarian wet dream into a equitable growth vehicle.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes, that is why density bonus programs are important. Why Prop. 13 reform will be important.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
the DB should be tiered off a local program where it exists. need much stronger displacement protections
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it is highly unlikely, near impossible that the city would ever allow destruction of RC units for new housing
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
not talking SF. in mt. view a 32 unit working class apartments demo'd for 29 SF townhomes.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
yes, the southern cities' attitudes when it comes to displacement are problematic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
i found it very disgusting. that's why displacement protection & local flexibility to do more are needed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I hope they get it negotiated in. But TBH, without RC in the southern suburbs, existing tenants get displaced
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.