To be fair, he said he's okay with true startups in DTPA. I agree with him that the Palantirization of PA is an issue.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I'm unapologetic urbanist, but if I were PA planner, I would be nervous about dominance of any single firm. Creates fragility.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @kimmaicutler
(What happens when Palantir leaves?)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @patrickc
what happened when Sun Microsystems left their Menlo Park campus?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Can't believe I'm arguing anti-development side here :-). Point just that these are ecosystems; homogeneity usually bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @kimmaicutler
(And city's goals are not Palantir's or even current residents'. City needs to be optimizing over a much longer time horizon.)
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @patrickc @kimmaicutler
PA is desirable precisely because they rejected the seductive urban trends of the 50s :-)
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @patrickc
and capture disproportionate land value returns in the process for its rentiering voters.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
Much of this hinges on the question of *who* gets to optimize, I think. And answer there not obvious IMO.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In practice, its wealthier, affluent communities that optimize for themselves, put pressure on gentrifying neighborhoods.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @patrickc
Affluent citizens actively engaging with & reaping benefits of government seems like a common failure of democracy.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.