I am not disagreeing with progressive taxation. However, without fixing land-use, land taxation norms in California, any
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @timredmondsf
Kim-Mai Cutler Retweeted Liam Dillon
public funding that we would raise for housing wouldn't go very far.https://twitter.com/dillonliam/status/731226931383943168 …
Kim-Mai Cutler added,
5 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@sanasaleem not if we use reztricrive zoning to depress land values.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf @sanasaleem
sigh. Restrictive zoning, in many cases, has raised land values.
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sanasaleem
thats because we dont really do it we allow exemption and spot zoning and we dont see zoning as a landvalue tool
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if u cant build anything but social housing on any land that land is worth far less.
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf @sanasaleem
have almost any kind of funding for social housing outside of inclusionary requirements.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sanasaleem
last thought kim fun to talk but u have far more faith in late stage us capitalism than i do. Hsg mkts dnt wk.
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf @sanasaleem
you've personally done very well with the federally subsidized, post-Prop. 13, land-use restricted housing system.
3 replies 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
.
@kimmaicutler@timredmondsf even if you disallowed new devlpmnt entirely, what happens to existing homes that represent 99% of the market?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Haha, that's what they don't want to you think about. Only developers profit off of city land!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.