What about how Prop. 13 was a windfall for incumbent property owners and enriched the old by sacrificing the future? https://twitter.com/48hills/status/732072289286545408 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
and a tax on wealth over 1 bullion would fund housing in all us cities
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @timredmondsf
I am not disagreeing with progressive taxation. However, without fixing land-use, land taxation norms in California, any
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @timredmondsf
Kim-Mai Cutler Retweeted Liam Dillon
public funding that we would raise for housing wouldn't go very far.https://twitter.com/dillonliam/status/731226931383943168 …
Kim-Mai Cutler added,
5 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@sanasaleem not if we use reztricrive zoning to depress land values.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf @sanasaleem
sigh. Restrictive zoning, in many cases, has raised land values.
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sanasaleem
thats because we dont really do it we allow exemption and spot zoning and we dont see zoning as a landvalue tool
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if u cant build anything but social housing on any land that land is worth far less.
4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
thereby enriching incumbent residential property owners bc we're a) not building to match pop. growth and b) do
-
-
attacks on prop 13 shortsighted. Santa Fe native families forced 2sell b/c skyrocketing RE values.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marymcnamara
.
@kimmaicutler@timredmondsf @PlnCom_Richards Elephant in housing room. Where is discussion of primary residency?http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2016/05/16/chinese-investors-snap-up-nearly-100-billion-us-homes/ …0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.