and a tax on wealth over 1 bullion would fund housing in all us cities
-
-
-
I am not disagreeing with progressive taxation. However, without fixing land-use, land taxation norms in California, any
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
looks like the tweets you're responding to have been deleted. What did they say?
-
or that big developments cause displacement.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For me, the key purpose of a progressive property tax raise is to tax the old out of their homes. Heartless, but necessary.
-
I disagree with that. I think stable housing is really important. But I think transfer taxes are an interesting tool.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
prop 13 is a disaster. But we used to tax high incomes at 80.percent
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i am a homeowner who hates prop 13.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
45 Million Acres in California are owned by us and managed by the federal government. 45% of the State.https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42346.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
250 people per Acre live in our city. In we just used federal land we could have 11 Billion live CA . Almost twice the World
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.