especially when paying them more is actually cheaper than building new housing in SF
-
-
-
well, if the district owns the land already and can keep it in perpetuity for teachers....
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think it's because any kind of salary increase would have to be phased in across the entire workforce, reflected in pensions too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
... and then just building more housing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@sfchronicle there's money to be made from contractors who will build this housing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
we should build them a hyper loop so they can commute from Coalinga
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hella tax advantaged this way isn't it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only people who can afford to be teachers are young adults of existing SF homeowners or living with someone wealthy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, I remember we had that policy in Soviet Union! Amazing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@NJOwen why would you build teachers public housing??? The avg teacher salary in our district (which my children do not attenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.