FWIW, @kimmaicutler's history of UC fees is factually incorrect. https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/715306066527924224 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Plus, part of what you ought to look at, is the how the Regents and UCOP spend their considerable revenues.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thomas_lord
@kimmaicutler The premise that lower state support requires high tuition ignores the inefficiency w/which education is produced.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thomas_lord
@thomas_lord technology can enhance education, but it is in many ways, a very hands-on practice, no matter what.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Oh, god. I am not saying they should be more MOOC-heavy or anything like that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thomas_lord
@kimmaicutler Admin heavy, athletics losses, real estate schemes, and backdoor public subsidy to industry are the issues.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thomas_lord
@thomas_lord Prop. 13 and Prop. 98 had a pretty profound effect on UC's share of public funding. http://www.ppic.org/main/blog_detail.asp?i=1667 …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I'm not getting that from that graph. How do explain, for starters, the rise of state share 78 to 87?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@thomas_lord to levels of public funding for education.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Sure. But not *only* to prop 13 but prop 13 plus how the legislature implemented it.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.