It can. But it would be like open heart surgery (and probably involve statewide Third Rails like CEQA, Prop. 13)https://twitter.com/seattle_nprgres/status/710539206292942850 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler with regional planning Prop 13 would be mostly irrelevant for housing. And regional planning is easy right? :D1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eean This isn't really true. Calif and (most?) CA cities can tax gross receipts, w/rent receipts taxed at a much higher rate.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2@eean some NIMBY pushback sometimes fall on the "no $$ for schools, roads, police" etc. problem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Not sure what you mean, but the land use /exp chart is great. Have you reviewed the #'s & assumptions? MF v SF exp seems high2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 I'm hoping to find other models, if you know of any.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler After Roaming on endless vacation for a few yrs consider a working group that dives into city/cnty data. You'd get volunteers1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RFrances2 I'm not endless vacation. :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.