It can. But it would be like open heart surgery (and probably involve statewide Third Rails like CEQA, Prop. 13)https://twitter.com/seattle_nprgres/status/710539206292942850 …
@eean Prop. 13 matters immensely because it determines the relative amts of tax revenue you can earn from diff types of land development.
-
-
@kimmaicutler@eean This isn't really true. Calif and (most?) CA cities can tax gross receipts, w/rent receipts taxed at a much higher rate. -
@RFrances2@eean some NIMBY pushback sometimes fall on the "no $$ for schools, roads, police" etc. problem. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@kimmaicutler if decisions were made at the nine county level then building automalls instead of housing doesn't make much sense -
@kimmaicutler I'm just replacing one fantasy with another. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@kimmaicutler@eean There might be reforms in 2018http://www.thenation.com/article/have-california-voters-finally-had-enough-of-prop-13/ … -
@rolandlisf@kimmaicutler@eean but only for commercial property, nobody’s touching it for residential
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.