@jayzalowitz @eean @kimmaicutler regardless, total #s small compared to what could be built, right? Plus, no rent control on new build.
-
-
Replying to @Kazanjy
@Kazanjy@eean@kimmaicutler SF needs a truly large co-living project that is fast-tracked IMHO3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@Kazanjy@eean higher borrowing costs for co-living developments because they are an unproven product.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy@eean I know exactly who could fund something like that here.. paging@WeWork (http://www.curbed.com/2016/1/13/10847036/wework-coliving-coworking-residential-110-wall-street …)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@Kazanjy@eean I'm sure they're interested in it, but probably best to prove product-market fit in NYC first before going to1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy@eean 20 mission already proved product market fit.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@Kazanjy@eean it's different when a company puts in a lot of remodeling costs, expenses into the building.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy@eean is there a way to test#leancoliving paging@ericries1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@Kazanjy@eean what does that mean?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy@eean is there a way to prove that you could fill up a co-living space at a profitable level above risk of pull out2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jayzalowitz @Kazanjy @eean landlords are clearly profitably putting 2-3 bunkbeds in rooms and calling that "co-living"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.