@Kazanjy @jayzalowitz Certainly helps but it's more complicated than that.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy I am still trying to find a legal hole for the non occupancy tax. Can we require all new construction is lived in?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy there isn't really a non-occupancy problem in SF, it's lower than most places...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eean
@eean@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy I still think it will prevent Foreign money parking from driving up money1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy I assume you mean driving up land value prices. ideally we would use foreign money to build real things.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eean
@eean@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy we dont need that. I am talking about the 2nd house issue we have around here.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy ha, so now it's actual foreign people that are the problem, not just foreign money.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eean
@eean@kimmaicutler@Kazanjy I think you are confusing people who have 10 houses in overpopulated places across the world with foreigners.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jayzalowitz
@jayzalowitz@eean@kimmaicutler regardless, total#s small compared to what could be built, right? Plus, no rent control on new build.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Kazanjy
@Kazanjy@eean@kimmaicutler SF needs a truly large co-living project that is fast-tracked IMHO3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jayzalowitz @Kazanjy @eean that was essentially killed last year. http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2015/06/group-housing-loopholes-could-soon-be-closed.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.