@kimmaicutler change is bad ok?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler Agnos didn't want to tear down the Embarcadero freeway either. Fortunately, Doug Wright did: http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Doug-Wright-helped-get-Embarcadero-Freeway-torn-5667835.php … -
@kimmaicutler That said, given the seminal role of the Freeway Rebellion, it'd be rich to watch Agnos & SF progressives fighting to save 280 - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@StanfordUSA@kimmaicutler@FitzTheReporter@enf Removing I-280 and Caltrain Railyard gets you 30 acres. Removing I-80 gets 27.5 acres (1) - 3 more replies
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler the difference is this teardown will lead to new housingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler I don't get how tearing down a mile of the 280 could make traffic worse than it already is.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler@FitzTheReporter yeah. I don't get his position. Nothing. Could be better for that neighborhoodThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler the nonsense intersection of "No Wall On the Waterfront!" & "Save 280!".#NoChangeEver#preservehistoricfreeways#AgnosPlanThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler@FitzTheReporter Traffic figures are much much different today. Also: tearing it down before rail is functioning?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.