Americans don't truly want to solve homelessness bc they want to stay in a system where property values mostly go uphttps://twitter.com/mayoredlee/status/702282405348945920 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler How are those necessarily related? SF could buy land in Central Valley and build houses for its homeless with the $ it spends.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seehafer
@seehafer@kimmaicutler 1) Also, surprising # of people opt to be homeless where they have roots rather than housed someplace new.4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CrispyLiberty
@CrispyLiberty@kimmaicutler Hypothetically, gov't could say "living on streets is illegal but we'll provide housing in another location".2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seehafer
@seehafer@CrispyLiberty but the public doesn't want to *pay* for that housing.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@CrispyLiberty They've never been given that option. It's too cruel for most sensibilities.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @seehafer
@seehafer@kimmaicutler Nevermind, it's already happening in SF. Just over smaller distances than we'd discussed. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/SF-moves-to-clear-Division-Street-homeless-6849590.php …4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@CrispyLiberty @seehafer Meanwhile, assessed property values go up by $11B a year. Voters do not make the connection between the two.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.