@kimmaicutler No doubt, just would be interesting to know extent of problem here in SF
-
-
Replying to @jrivanob
@jrivanob but stats show the LLC buying of homes >$5M is actually mostly down in the South Bay. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/us/us-will-track-secret-buyers-of-luxury-real-estate.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Yeah, LLCs frequently purchase in Mission (& hard to know real owners) but not >$5M. LLC purchase is its own problem though.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler But for >$5M only, would be nice to have numbers on smaller purchases, like they're doing for >$1M in Miami.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
@jrivanob@kimmaicutler would be a good project (do it!) but anecdotally foreign buyers don't go for ~emerging~ neighborhoods1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @coryweinberg
@coryweinberg@kimmaicutler Great, once the Mission has "emerged" we'll really have a housing shit show on our hands.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jrivanob
@jrivanob@coryweinberg@kimmaicutler Is there a means of "submerging" one's neighborhood, then?5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam
@MBridegam@jrivanob@coryweinberg correct. That is the Tenderloin strategy. Acquire 25% of parcels. Hold in perpetuity for low-income ppl.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@jrivanob@coryweinberg Why to keep/expand rent control, build more 100% affordable, keep insisting housing is to live in.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MBridegam @jrivanob @coryweinberg no one resembling the historic population in the Mission can really afford to show up anymore.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.