@chrsdcook this is expensive. It isn't magic.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler true, of course. But why not shoot for as much affordability as possible rather than defending current system?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrsdcook
@chrsdcook the current system is total paralysis in the face of relentless capital, population growth2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler not true, there's been tons of construction. you think city should just enable capital and population growth w/out controls?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrsdcook
@chrsdcook we've had 10-20K ppl move her per year. Built 4K units last year but only 1K for most of the years before that.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler so let's build maximum affordable housing, density and otherwise, keep the city affordable and diverse, not just any housing.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrsdcook
@chrsdcook it asks for 30% unlike the 20% in the state program.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler yes, but market rate drives up the entire market, doesn't just fill slots. People demand maximum affordability. why opposed?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @bl
@bl@kimmaicutler so you guys are against environmental review? Environmental impact studies?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@chrsdcook @bl EIRs are impt but practical data shows that they are usually abused for purposes that have nothing to do w the environment
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.