@larissaarcher @kimmaicutler Michigan here; very interested in hearing proposals for transferring SF's housing demand to our cities.
-
-
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey can't tell of that's snark. How would you feel a out more tech company HQs in your cities. That's what we're talking about.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher and I don't see build-only sol'ns as the answer, whether in SF or in Ann Arbor. But "go to Detroit" isn't much answer either.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey but "don't pile on SF" might be the start. .1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher and "don't focus all development impact on small, character-defining neighborhoods" probably good in either state.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey@kimmaicutler this is the s*** we're having to deal with from density-promoters, btw: https://www.facebook.com/housingrightsSF/photos/gm.868147613306508/10153201292630303/?type=3&theater … terrifying.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher@murphmonkey so misleading. Land in this city is *privately owned* so out of 30K parcels, only 240 will actually turn over1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@murphmonkey and those are city-owned properties?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher@murphmonkey no, that's just the estimate of which private land owners might decide to sell for re-development.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@murphmonkey what would keep more of them from doing so? 240 is still unfortunate for those who've made those buildings home.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@larissaarcher @murphmonkey Also RC doesn't stay affordable, it gets set at market rate every time tenants move out.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@murphmonkey right. but RC only applies to pre-1979 buildings. So are non-RC buildings on the "map" in fact threatened?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher@murphmonkey I doubt it would financially pencil for a someone to demolish a bunch of market-rate units1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.